Rebecca Sramkova vs Yulia Putintseva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance: Over the last six months, Putintseva won 42.93% of points on her second serve, slightly higher than Sramkova's 42.42%. Could this small margin make a difference? It might, given the high correlation between second serve efficacy and match outcomes.
• Return game stats: Sramkova has a better track record with return points, securing 50.19% of opponent's second serve points, compared to Putintseva's 48.29%. In terms of first serve returns, Sramkova also edges slightly ahead with 31.8% compared to Putintseva's 31.18%, suggesting an advantage in return games.
• Breakpoint pressure: Sramkova leads in breakpoint saves with 49.25%, just ahead of Putintseva's 48.06%. Does this indicate composure under pressure? The numbers suggest so, particularly for Sramkova.
• Overall match performance: In the past year, Putintseva has a match win rate of 59.62% versus Sramkova's 56.45%. Both players show consistency but Putintseva has a slight edge here.
• Surface performance: Clay appears to be both players' preferred surface, each boasting a career win rate of 64%. Interestingly, Putintseva struggles most on grass with just a 47% success rate, while Sramkova's weakest performance is on hard courts, with a 55% win rate.
• Competition level: On the main tour in the past year, Sramkova has shown stronger performance, winning 65.63% of matches compared to Putintseva's 60%. Does Sramkova's experience here give her an edge? It might suggest a higher tour-level consistency.
• Direct head-to-head: Sramkova leads their direct encounters, having won their only meeting convincingly in straight sets, 6-0 6-4 on clay. Can history repeat itself? It seems indicative of a potential advantage for Sramkova.
• Deciding set outcomes: Over the last year, Sramkova has won 70% of matches that went to a deciding set, slightly better than Putintseva's 69%. If the match stretches to a decider, Sramkova might hold an edge.
• Break point conversion: Sramkova again is ahead, converting 39.47% of break point opportunities compared to Putintseva's 34.42%. This could be crucial in deciding key moments of the match.
• Opponent quality: Both players have faced similarly ranked opponents recently, with averages at 95.6 for Putintseva and 94.55 for Sramkova, indicating comparable competition levels.

Editorial Prediction (June 18, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming match approaches, the statistics suggest an exciting contest between Yulia Putintseva and Rebecca Sramkova. Both players display strengths in various areas, but Sramkova holds slight advantages in several statistics that could prove decisive.

Sramkova's performance in returning serve and converting break points demonstrates her ability to seize control in crucial areas of the match. Her success in head-to-head encounters also highlights a psychological edge over Putintseva.

While Putintseva has shown strong match wins over the last year, Sramkova's consistency on the main tour and composure in high-pressure situations suggest she might maintain the upper hand should the match intensify.

Considering the overall analysis, Rebecca Sramkova appears to be the more likely victor in this meeting, leveraging her slight statistical advantages and past head-to-head success against Yulia Putintseva.